Google and Facebook fail to remove scam adverts
Google and
Facebook are failing to remove scam online adverts even after fraud victims
report them, a new investigation reveals.
Consumer group Which? found 34 per cent
of victims who reported an advert that led to a scam on Google said the advert
was not taken down by the search engine.
Twenty six per cent of victims who reported an
advert on Facebook that resulted in them being scammed said the advert was not
removed by the social network.
A 'reactive' rather than proactive approach
taken by the tech companies towards fraudulent content taken is 'not fit for
purpose', Which? claims.
The firms spend millions on detection
technology but are falling short when it comes to taking down dodgy ads before
they dupe victims, it claims.
Even if fake and fraudulent adverts are
successfully taken down they often pop up again under different names, Which?
found.
Tech giants like Google and Facebook make
significant profits from adverts, including ones that lead to scams, according
to the consumer champion.
'Our
latest research has exposed significant flaws with the reactive approach taken
by tech giants including Google and Facebook in response to the reporting of
fraudulent content – leaving victims worryingly exposed to scams,' said Adam
French, Consumer Rights Expert at Which?.
'Online platforms must be given a legal
responsibility to identify, remove and prevent fake and fraudulent content on
their sites.'
One scam victim, Stefan Johansson, who lost
£30.50, told Which? he had repeatedly reported a scam retailer operating under
the names 'Swanbrooch' and 'Omerga' to Facebook.
Swanbrooch and Omerga were both approached for
comment.
Another victim, Mandy, told Which? she was
tricked by a fake Clarks 'clearance sale' advert she saw on Facebook.
She
paid £85 for two pairs of boots, but instead she received a large box
containing a pair of cheap sunglasses.
'I've had a lot of back and forth with my bank
over the past six months, trying to prove that I didn't receive what I
ordered,' Mandy said.
Facebook has since removed this advert and the
advertiser's account.
In a statement, a Facebook spokesperson said
'fraudulent activity is not allowed on Facebook and we have taken action on a
number of pages reported to us by Which?'.
'Our 35,000 strong team of safety and security
experts work alongside sophisticated AI to proactively identify and remove this
content, and we urge people to report any suspicious activity to us.'
Which admitted that a visible 'Report
this ad' button features on all Facebook's promoted content, which 'makes
reporting easy'.
But the Google reporting form is 'hard to find
and time-consuming', it says.
Which? found it was not immediately clear how
to report fraudulent content to Google, and when they did it involved navigating
five complex pages of information.
Users can report a dodgy Google ad by
searching 'How to report bad ads on Google', clicking on the support page and
filling out the necessary information.
Google said in response to the report that
it's 'constantly reviewing ads, sites and accounts' to make sure they comply
with its policies.
'We take action on potentially bad ads
reported to us and these complaints are always manually reviewed.'
Which?
commissioned its online survey of 2,000 UK adults aged 18 and over between
February 19 and 23 this year, conducted by Opinium.
Of those surveyed, 298 people said they had
fallen victim to a scam through an ad on either a search engine or social media
and reported it to the company.
More victims had fallen for scam ads on
Facebook than on Google – 27 per cent and 19 per cent,
respectively. Three per cent said they'd been tricked by an ad on Twitter.
Which? said Twitter's reporting process is
'quick and simple to use, but it doesn't have an option to specifically report
an advert that could be a scam.
A Twitter spokesperson said: 'Where we
identify violations of our rules, we take robust enforcement action.
'We're constantly adapting to bad actors'
evolving methods, and we will continue to iterate and improve upon our policies
as the industry evolves.'
Also in the survey findings, 43 per cent of
scam victims conned by an advert they saw online – via a search engine or
social media ad – said they did not report the scam to the platform hosting it.
The biggest reason for not reporting adverts
that caused a scam to Facebook was that victims didn't think the platform would
do anything about it or take it down – this was the response from nearly a
third (31 per cent) of victims.
For Google, the main reason for not reporting
the scam ad was that the victim didn't know how to do so – this applied to 32
per cent of victims.
Worryingly, 51 per cent of 1,800 search engine
users Which? surveyed said they did not know how to report suspicious ads found
in search listings.
nd
35 per cent of 1,600 social media users said they didn't know how to report a
suspicious advert seen on social media channels.
Tech platforms should be given legal
responsibility for preventing fake and fraudulent adverts from appearing on
their sites, Which? says.
It's calling for the government to take the
opportunity to include content that leads to online scams in the scope of its
proposed Online Safety Bill.
The government is set to introduce its Online
Safety Bill later this year, which will enforce stricter regulation around
protecting young people online and harsh punishments for platforms found to be
failing to meet a duty of care.
'The case for including scams in the Online
Safety Bill is overwhelming and the government needs to act now,' said
French.
Comments
Post a Comment